What is right? Veg or non-vegetarian?
This question is very old. Some present this question with the help of demons, while others with the help of morality. Some view it as a matter of righteousness. Everyone has a different approach to this question.
The question asked on the side of righteousness does not upset a thoughtful or prudent man. Because religious beliefs are basically irrational. Therefore, a prudent person does not beg for the right questions. But the questions asked by the ghost or the moral part make the wise man uneasy, motivate the beggar. Most of them are carnivores. (Even among the irrational people, the proportion of those who eat meat is high.) Therefore, if irrational acts are being committed by us, the irrational people feel guilty. This is where the ideological conflict in the mind begins.
I don’t consider myself prudent. But considers the side of conscience. I consider myself to be on the path of conscience. I’m still not fully discreet. I don't know if that will happen. But I'm definitely trying to be prudent. That's why this question made me uneasy, made me think. It was also a process of thinking. This question came to mind on different occasions, at different times. And on different occasions I thought about it. I thought about this question when I went to fetch mutton, when I watched movies, when I saw different animals being hunted in videos on social media, when I was reading, when I was feeding my pets, when I was teasing them. Sometimes just thinking about it while sleeping. It is an attempt to put into words what came out of this brainstorming.
In terms of demonic compassion, every soul loves its own soul. Nature has given every animal the right to live its own life. Every living thing tries to run away from the crisis it sees. He tries his best to save his own life. This is an innate tendency given by nature to every living thing. Therefore, every living thing has value. But nature has also limited the right to life of many of these creatures. There are many animals in nature that can only survive by eating other animals. Therefore, no matter how important the life of the predatory animal may seem to its own life, nature has limited its right to live. So it should be noted that ghostly compassion is not a matter of nature. In his view, it is important for both predators and predators to survive. The subject of ghosts is important to human beings. Because only human beings can think. He feels the importance of compassion, mercy, etc.
One of the carnivores is fine. But should humans eat animals? Why should an animal like a human being deny the right to life of other animals? Carnivores are carnivores by nature. Is man like that? A closer look at this question reveals that man is also a misogynist by nature. Man has been eating meat since he was born on earth. Many creatures, from insects to large animals, have been eating man since he was not a man. It has been discovered that after eating the flesh of animals that have died in the forest, humans find roasted meat more palatable. And then we read in school that humans started roasting meat and other foods. This means that humans have been predators from the beginning. Some other animals that are close to humans, such as monkeys, are also predators. Even in the ancient literature of the world, there are many descriptions of man-eating meat. Some evidence from excavations also testifies to man-eating carnivores. I mean, man was never just a vegetarian.
The second point is that the animals that man eats, he also raises. If these same animals were wandering in the forest in their natural state, would they have gained so much life? Could a wild goat live five years? Today, goats can live an average of seven to ten years under human shelter. In the forest, elephants, tigers and lions will grow old and die. But deer or other small animals do not seem to die of old age. This is because most of these animals are preyed upon before they reach old age. Man is now living under the shelter of man for a longer period of time than the animals that are currently being raised for meat are living in the forest. That is, the man who eats them does not shorten their life, but prolongs it. Another important thing is that these animals would have to live in constant fear in the forest. These are the animals that are living a comfortable life under the shelter of human beings. I think this is possible only because man eats them. If humans did not eat these animals, they would have to live in the jungle, live under the shadow of fear, and at a very young age they would have to die in the attack of some other animal. Because these man-made animals are very weak animals in nature.
Here I think both ghostly compassion and morality come to an end. Man is basically an animal that makes his own life more interesting, fascinating. But the expectation that he should not destroy nature in this tone is true, there should be no resentment.
The question asked on the side of righteousness does not upset a thoughtful or prudent man. Because religious beliefs are basically irrational. Therefore, a prudent person does not beg for the right questions. But the questions asked by the ghost or the moral part make the wise man uneasy, motivate the beggar. Most of them are carnivores. (Even among the irrational people, the proportion of those who eat meat is high.) Therefore, if irrational acts are being committed by us, the irrational people feel guilty. This is where the ideological conflict in the mind begins.
I don’t consider myself prudent. But considers the side of conscience. I consider myself to be on the path of conscience. I’m still not fully discreet. I don't know if that will happen. But I'm definitely trying to be prudent. That's why this question made me uneasy, made me think. It was also a process of thinking. This question came to mind on different occasions, at different times. And on different occasions I thought about it. I thought about this question when I went to fetch mutton, when I watched movies, when I saw different animals being hunted in videos on social media, when I was reading, when I was feeding my pets, when I was teasing them. Sometimes just thinking about it while sleeping. It is an attempt to put into words what came out of this brainstorming.
In terms of demonic compassion, every soul loves its own soul. Nature has given every animal the right to live its own life. Every living thing tries to run away from the crisis it sees. He tries his best to save his own life. This is an innate tendency given by nature to every living thing. Therefore, every living thing has value. But nature has also limited the right to life of many of these creatures. There are many animals in nature that can only survive by eating other animals. Therefore, no matter how important the life of the predatory animal may seem to its own life, nature has limited its right to live. So it should be noted that ghostly compassion is not a matter of nature. In his view, it is important for both predators and predators to survive. The subject of ghosts is important to human beings. Because only human beings can think. He feels the importance of compassion, mercy, etc.
One of the carnivores is fine. But should humans eat animals? Why should an animal like a human being deny the right to life of other animals? Carnivores are carnivores by nature. Is man like that? A closer look at this question reveals that man is also a misogynist by nature. Man has been eating meat since he was born on earth. Many creatures, from insects to large animals, have been eating man since he was not a man. It has been discovered that after eating the flesh of animals that have died in the forest, humans find roasted meat more palatable. And then we read in school that humans started roasting meat and other foods. This means that humans have been predators from the beginning. Some other animals that are close to humans, such as monkeys, are also predators. Even in the ancient literature of the world, there are many descriptions of man-eating meat. Some evidence from excavations also testifies to man-eating carnivores. I mean, man was never just a vegetarian.
The second point is that the animals that man eats, he also raises. If these same animals were wandering in the forest in their natural state, would they have gained so much life? Could a wild goat live five years? Today, goats can live an average of seven to ten years under human shelter. In the forest, elephants, tigers and lions will grow old and die. But deer or other small animals do not seem to die of old age. This is because most of these animals are preyed upon before they reach old age. Man is now living under the shelter of man for a longer period of time than the animals that are currently being raised for meat are living in the forest. That is, the man who eats them does not shorten their life, but prolongs it. Another important thing is that these animals would have to live in constant fear in the forest. These are the animals that are living a comfortable life under the shelter of human beings. I think this is possible only because man eats them. If humans did not eat these animals, they would have to live in the jungle, live under the shadow of fear, and at a very young age they would have to die in the attack of some other animal. Because these man-made animals are very weak animals in nature.
Here I think both ghostly compassion and morality come to an end. Man is basically an animal that makes his own life more interesting, fascinating. But the expectation that he should not destroy nature in this tone is true, there should be no resentment.
Comments
Post a Comment